IndiaTrending

7 yrs after lower court employee put videos on YouTube, HC charges him with scandalizing judiciary

By: Express News Service | Chandigarh |

Revealed: June 3, 2020 11:21:10 pm


Harmeet Singh had joined the Classes Division in Ludhiana in March 2009 as clerk and was later posted at Jagraon however he allegedly saved on pressuring the judges there to switch him again. (File)

THE PUNJAB and Haryana Excessive Court Wednesday charged a lower court employee with scandalizing the judicial establishments by making a YouTube channel and importing videos by which he allegedly leveled false allegations towards judicial officers and the excessive court judges.

The Excessive Court had initiated contempt proceedings towards Harmeet Singh in 2013 following a reference from the District and Classes Choose, Ludhiana with regard to varied allegations towards him pertaining to his conduct after he was transferred from Ludhiana. The counsel representing the accused, nevertheless, argued that the allegations can’t be thought of to be a gospel fact and likewise that he has already been punished for importing the videos as his 4 annual increments of pay had been stopped in 2018. It was additionally argued that placing materials on YouTube doesn’t quantity to “publication” for the general public at giant as a result of the account is private and restricted to few acquaintances.

A division bench of Justices Jaswant Singh and Sant Parkash within the order stated it will be within the curiosity of justice if correct cost is framed towards the contemnor and alternative is given to him to substantiate his declare by the use of producing proof.

“The contentions raised on behalf of the respondent-contemnor with regarding to the double jeopardy, the circulation by way of YouTube not amounting to publication and whether it amounted to scandalizing the judicial system are the moot questions which can be answered only after the evidence and submissions of both the parties are evaluated,” reads the order.

Harmeet Singh had joined the Classes Division in Ludhiana in March 2009 as clerk and was later posted at Jagraon however he allegedly saved on pressuring the judges there to switch him again. He was transferred to Classes Division at Mansa later.

A complete of 5 charges have been framed towards Harmeet Singh within the order handed Wednesday. The principle allegation is of making a YouTube channel titled “Ugly face of Indian Judiciary” and importing videos by which false allegations had been allegedly levelled towards the judicial officers and the general public was discouraged from searching for justice from court of legislation.

The second cost is that he uploaded video clips on social media in connection with his switch from Ludhiana and tried to lower the dignity of the excessive court and scandalized “the names of Hon’ble Sitting Judges”. The third cost is of scandalizing the entire judicial establishment and attacking the integrity of judges.

“That uploading such videos which scandalize…particularly the names of the Hon’ble Judges of this court do not come under the purview of liberty of free expression. Such unfounded, unwarranted and irresponsible aspersions against the judges or court, which sub-serve the public interest in reasonable measure, is certainly an attack on the Judges’s integrity and is offensive, intimidatory and malicious,” reads the cost.

The fourth cost is of allegedly concocting the tales of corruption, bribery and nepotism within the district judiciary. The ultimate cost towards Harmeet Singh is that he uploaded videos on social media and made statements within the media with out the earlier sanction of the competent authority.

Harmeet Singh earlier in a reply had informed the court {that a} judicial officer had threatened to take away him from service and made “dirty and cheap remarks” in regards to the workers members. He additionally informed the court that he was as soon as detained in court for hours. Concerning importing of videos, he stated that he had despatched 100 representations however no response was acquired and his efforts to fulfill the then Performing Chief Justice and the District and Classes Choose additionally failed.

In response to the charges, he didn’t plead responsible and claimed trial. The case has been adjourned to September 24 for additional consideration.

📣 The Indian Specific is now on Telegram. Click on here to join our channel (@indianexpress) and keep up to date with the newest headlines

For all the newest India News, obtain Indian Express App.

© The Indian Specific (P) Ltd


Source link

Tags
Show More

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Back to top button
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker